S. 5 Senate Immigration
Laken Riley Act
BECAME LAW JAN 29, 2025
Became Law on Jan 29, 2025.
- Senate Introduced in Senate Jan 6, 2025
- Senate Introduced in the Senate. Read the first time. Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under Read the First Time. Jan 6, 2025
- Senate Read the second time. Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 1. Jan 7, 2025
- Senate Motion to proceed to consideration of measure made in Senate. (CR S46) Jan 8, 2025
- Senate Cloture motion on the motion to proceed to the measure presented in Senate. (CR S46) Jan 8, 2025
- Senate Motion to proceed to measure considered in Senate. (CR S70) Jan 9, 2025
- Senate Cloture on the motion to proceed to the measure invoked in Senate by Yea-Nay Vote. 84 - 9. Record Vote Number: 1. (CR S73) Jan 9, 2025
- SenateOn Cloture on the Motion to Proceed S. 5 Jan 9, 2025
- Senate Motion to proceed to measure considered in Senate. (CR S83) Jan 13, 2025
- Senate Motion to proceed to consideration of measure agreed to in Senate by Yea-Nay Vote. 82 - 10. Record Vote Number: 2. (CR S87) Jan 13, 2025
- Senate Measure laid before Senate by motion. Jan 13, 2025
- SenateOn the Motion to Proceed S. 5 Jan 13, 2025
- Senate Considered by Senate. (consideration: CR S130) Jan 14, 2025
- Senate Considered by Senate. (consideration: CR S161-182) Jan 15, 2025
- Senate Cloture motion on the measure presented in Senate. (CR S182) Jan 15, 2025
- Senate Considered by Senate. (consideration: CR S198-218) Jan 16, 2025
- Senate Considered by Senate. (consideration: CR S237-241) Jan 17, 2025
- Senate Cloture on the measure invoked in Senate by Yea-Nay Vote. 61 - 35. Record Vote Number: 5. (CR S240) Jan 17, 2025
- SenateOn the Cloture Motion S. 5 Jan 17, 2025
- Senate Considered by Senate. (consideration: CR S246-251) Jan 20, 2025
- Senate Passed/agreed to in Senate: Passed Senate with an amendment by Yea-Nay Vote. 64 - 35. Record Vote Number: 7. Jan 20, 2025
- Senate Passed Senate with an amendment by Yea-Nay Vote. 64 - 35. Record Vote Number: 7. (text: CR S250-251) Jan 20, 2025
- SenateOn Passage of the Bill S. 5 Jan 20, 2025
- Senate Message on Senate action sent to the House. Jan 21, 2025
- House Received in the House. Jan 21, 2025
- House Held at the desk. Jan 21, 2025
- House Rules Committee Resolution H. Res. 53 Reported to House. Rule provides for consideration of H.R. 471 and S. 5. The resolution provides for consideration of H.R. 471 under a structured rule with one hour of general debate and one motion to recommit. Also, the resolution provides for consideration of S. 5 under a closed rule with one hour of general debate and one motion to commit. Jan 21, 2025
- House Rule H. Res. 53 passed House. Jan 22, 2025
- House Considered under the provisions of rule H. Res. 53. (consideration: CR H277-284) Jan 22, 2025
- House Rule provides for consideration of H.R. 471 and S. 5. The resolution provides for consideration of H.R. 471 under a structured rule with one hour of general debate and one motion to recommit. Also, the resolution provides for consideration of S. 5 under a closed rule with one hour of general debate and one motion to commit. Jan 22, 2025
- House DEBATE - The House proceeded with one hour of debate on S. 5. Jan 22, 2025
- House The previous question was ordered pursuant to the rule. Jan 22, 2025
- House POSTPONED PROCEEDINGS - At the conclusion of the debate on S. 5, the Chair put the question on passage of the bill and by voice vote announced that the ayes had prevailed. Mr. Raskin demanded the yeas and nays and the Chair postponed further proceedings until a time to be announced. Jan 22, 2025
- House Considered as unfinished business. (consideration: CR H285-286) Jan 22, 2025
- Senate Passed/agreed to in House: On passage Passed by the Yeas and Nays: 263 - 156 (Roll no. 23). (text: CR H277-278) Jan 22, 2025
- House On passage Passed by the Yeas and Nays: 263 - 156 (Roll no. 23). (text: CR H277-278) Jan 22, 2025
- House Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection. Jan 22, 2025
- HouseOn Passage Jan 22, 2025
- SenatePresented to President. Jan 23, 2025
- SenateSigned by President. Jan 29, 2025
- Senate Latest actionBecame Public Law No: 119-1. Jan 29, 2025
Cosponsors
53
Subjects
Border security and unlawful immigrationCivil actions and liabilityCrimes against propertyCriminal investigation, prosecution, interrogationDetention of personsImmigration status and proceduresIntergovernmental relationsRefugees, asylum, displaced personsState and local government operationsViolent crimeVisas and passports
Summary
Laken Riley ActThis act requires the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) to detain certain non-U.S. nationals (aliens under federal law) who have been arrested for burglary, theft, larceny, shoplifting, assault of a law enforcement officer, or any crime that results in death or serious bodily injury to another person. The act also authorizes states to sue the federal government for decisions or alleged failures related to immigration enforcement.Under this act, DHS must detain an individual who (1) is unlawfully present in the United States or did not possess the necessary documents when applying for admission; and (2) has been charged with, arrested for, convicted of, or admits to having committed acts that constitute the essential elements of the above crimes.The act also authorizes state governments to sue for injunctive relief over certain immigration-related decisions or alleged failures by the federal government if the decision or failure caused the state or its residents harm, including financial harm of more than $100. Specifically, the state government may sue the federal government over adecision to release a non-U.S. national from custody;failure to fulfill requirements relating to inspecting individuals seeking admission into the United States, including requirements related to asylum interviews;failure to fulfill a requirement to stop issuing visas to nationals of a country that unreasonably denies or delays acceptance of nationals of that country;violation of limitations on immigration parole, such as the requirement that parole be granted only on a case-by-case basis; orfailure to detain an individual who has been ordered removed from the United States.
Summary as of: Public Law
Comments · 0
Please log in to post a comment.
Loading comments...