Skip to main content
H.R. 184 House Public Lands and Natural Resources

Action Versus No Action Act

Introduced
Jan 3, 2025
Sponsor
Rep. McClintock, Tom (R-CA-5)
View on Congress.gov (opens in a new tab)

STAGE 2 OF 8 — COMMITTEE CONSIDERATION

Currently in the House. Last action: subcommittee hearings held on May 21, 2026.

  1. House Introduced in House Jan 3, 2025
  2. House Referred to the Committee on Natural Resources, and in addition to the Committee on Agriculture, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned. Jan 3, 2025
  3. House Referred to the Subcommittee on Forestry and Horticulture. Feb 7, 2025
  4. House Referred to the Subcommittee on Federal Lands. May 12, 2026
  5. House Subcommittee Hearings Held May 21, 2026

Subjects

Environmental assessment, monitoring, researchForests, forestry, treesWildlife conservation and habitat protection

Committees

  • Natural Resources Committee
    • Referred To , Jan 3, 2025
  • Agriculture Committee
    • Referred To , Jan 3, 2025

Summary

Action Versus No Action ActThis bill limits the scope of an environmental assessment (EA) or environmental impact statement (EIS) conducted under the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 for forest management activity on certain public lands to only the following two alternatives: (1) the effects of the forest management activity, and (2) no action.The bill applies to any EA or EIS prepared by the Forest Service or the Department of the Interior for a forest management activity on public land that is suitable for timber production and thatoccurs on land designated as an insect and disease treatment area under the Healthy Forests Restoration Act of 2003,is developed through a collaborative process,is proposed by a resource advisory committee, oris covered by a community wildfire protection plan.In the case of the alternative of no action, the Forest Service or Interior must consider whether to evaluatethe effect of no action on forest health, potential losses of life and property, habitat diversity, wildfire potential, insect and disease potential, and timber production; andthe implications of a resulting decline in forest health, loss of habitat diversity, wildfire, or insect or disease infestation on potential losses of life and property, domestic water supply in the project area, wildlife habitat loss, and other economic and social factors.

Summary as of: Introduced in House

Comments · 0

Loading...

Loading comments...