Skip to main content

Question on Notice 571/2026: Road connection between Upper Kedron and Mount Nebo Road

1 people tracking
View Answer (opens in a new tab)
Status: Answered, finished
Question Number: 571
Year: 2026
Asked By: Ms J Bush
Minister Responsible: Deputy Premier, Minister for State Development, Infrastructure and Planning and Minister for Industrial Relations (Hon J Bleijie)
Asked Date: 14 May 2026
Answer Due: 15 June 2026
Date Tabled: 15 June 2026

Topic

Road connection between Upper Kedron and Mount Nebo Road

Question

With reference to the 2025-26 Crisafulli Budget Map which confirms a commitment to change ‘the development conditions in Upper Kedron to allow a public-use, general traffic road connection between Upper Kedron and Mount Nebo Road’— Will the Deputy Premier advise (a) any budget allocation this project has received, (b) what steps the Department has taken to progress this commitment, or when work will commence on this project and (c) what negotiations the Department has commenced with Brisbane City Council in relation to changing the relevant development conditions in Upper Kedron?

Full text in the tabled PDF (opens in a new tab).

Comments · 1

+1
SP78
On 15 June 2026, the response to Question on Notice 571/2026 stated that “Engagement with the Brisbane City Council on the delivery of this election commitment has progressed.” Given several months have now passed, could an updated position please be provided outlining what progress has occurred since June, the current status of engagement with Brisbane City Council, and the expected next steps and timeframe for the Upper Kedron–Mount Nebo Road connection? This is particularly relevant given that this week, Cr Steven Toomey’s office advised me by email that responsibility for construction of the road sits with the developer, Cedar Woods. This appears to raise an important question regarding where responsibility currently sits and what has resulted from the State Government’s engagement with Brisbane City Council. Could the Government therefore clarify the current position, including which party is responsible for progressing the proposed connection and what actions have been taken since the June 2026 response?